Transgenderism: A Pathogenic Meme

Bruce Jenner, porn addict and autogynephile
Bruce Jenner, porn addict and blatant autogynephile

The idea that one’s sex is a “feeling,” not a fact, has permeated our culture and is leaving casualties in its wake. “Gender dysphoria” should be treated with psychotherapy, not surgery. This is a new article by Dr. Paul McHugh, re-blogged from the Witherspoon Institute’s “Public Discourse.”

For forty years as the University Distinguished Service Professor of Psychiatry at Johns Hopkins Medical School—twenty-six of which were also spent as Psychiatrist in Chief of Johns Hopkins Hospital—I’ve been studying people who claim to be transgender. Over that time, I’ve watched the phenomenon change and expand in remarkable ways.

A rare issue of a few men—both homosexual and heterosexual men, including some who sought sex-change surgery because they were erotically aroused by the thought or image of themselves as women—has spread to include women as well as men. Even young boys and girls have begun to present themselves as of the opposite sex. Over the last ten or fifteen years, this phenomenon has increased in prevalence, seemingly exponentially. Now, almost everyone has heard of or met such a person.

Publicity, especially from early examples such as “Christine” Jorgenson, “Jan” Morris, and “Renee” Richards, has promoted the idea that one’s biological sex is a choice, leading to widespread cultural acceptance of the concept. And, that idea, quickly accepted in the 1980s, has since run through the American public like a revelation or “meme” affecting much of our thought about sex.

The champions of this meme, encouraged by their alliance with the broader LGBT movement, claim that whether you are a man or a woman, a boy or a girl, is more of a disposition or feeling about yourself than a fact of nature. And, much like any other feeling, it can change at any time, and for all sorts of reasons. Therefore, no one could predict who would swap this fact of their makeup, nor could one justifiably criticize such a decision.

At Johns Hopkins, after pioneering sex-change surgery, we demonstrated that the practice brought no important benefits. As a result, we stopped offering that form of treatment in the 1970s. Our efforts, though, had little influence on the emergence of this new idea about sex, or upon the expansion of the number of “transgendered” among young and old.

Olympic Athlete Turned “Pin-Up” Girl

This history may clarify some aspects of the latest high-profile transgender claimant. Bruce Jenner, the 1976 Olympic decathlon champion, is turning away from his titular identity as one of the “world’s greatest male athletes.” Jenner announced recently that he “identifies as a woman” and, with medical and surgical help, is busy reconstructing his physique.

I have not met or examined Jenner, but his behavior resembles that of some of the transgender males we have studied over the years. These men wanted to display themselves in sexy ways, wearing provocative female garb. More often than not, while claiming to be a woman in a man’s body, they declared themselves to be “lesbians” (attracted to other women). The photograph of the posed, corseted, breast-boosted Bruce Jenner (a man in his mid-sixties, but flaunting himself as if a “pin-up” girl in her twenties or thirties) on the cover of Vanity Fair suggests that he may fit the behavioral mold that Ray Blanchard has dubbed an expression of “autogynephilia”—from gynephilia (attracted to women) and auto (in the form of oneself).

The Emperor’s New Clothes

But the meme—that your sex is a feeling, not a biological fact, and can change at any time—marches on through our society. In a way, it’s reminiscent of the Hans Christian Andersen tale, The Emperor’s New Clothes. In that tale, the Emperor, believing that he wore an outfit of special beauty imperceptible to the rude or uncultured, paraded naked through his town to the huzzahs of courtiers and citizens anxious about their reputations. Many onlookers to the contemporary transgender parade, knowing that a disfavored opinion is worse than bad taste today, similarly fear to identify it as a misapprehension.

I am ever trying to be the boy among the bystanders who points to what’s real. I do so not only because truth matters, but also because overlooked amid the hoopla—enhanced now by Bruce Jenner’s celebrity and Annie Leibovitz’s photography—stand many victims. Think, for example, of the parents whom no one—not doctors, schools, nor even churches—will help to rescue their children from these strange notions of being transgendered and the problematic lives these notions herald. These youngsters now far outnumber the Bruce Jenner type of transgender. Although they may be encouraged by his public reception, these children generally come to their ideas about their sex not through erotic interests but through a variety of youthful psychosocial conflicts and concerns.

First, though, let us address the basic assumption of the contemporary parade: the idea that exchange of one’s sex is possible. It, like the storied Emperor, is starkly, nakedly false. Transgendered men do not become women, nor do transgendered women become men. All (including Bruce Jenner) become feminized men or masculinized women, counterfeits or impersonators of the sex with which they “identify.” In that lies their problematic future.

When “the tumult and shouting dies,” it proves not easy nor wise to live in a counterfeit sexual garb. The most thorough follow-up of sex-reassigned people—extending over thirty years and conducted in Sweden, where the culture is strongly supportive of the transgendered—documents their lifelong mental unrest. Ten to fifteen years after surgical reassignment, the suicide rate of those who had undergone sex-reassignment surgery rose to twenty times that of comparable peers.

How to Treat Gender Dysphoria

So how should we make sense of this matter today? As with any mental phenomenon, what’s crucial is noting its fundamental characteristic and then identifying the many ways in which that characteristic can manifest itself.

The central issue with all transgender subjects is one of assumption—the assumption that one’s sexual nature is misaligned with one’s biological sex. This problematic assumption comes about in several different ways, and these distinctions in its generation determine how to manage and treat it.

Based on the photographic evidence one might guess Bruce Jenner falls into the group of men who come to their disordered assumption through being sexually aroused by the image of themselves as women. He could have been treated for this misaligned arousal with psychotherapy and medication. Instead, he found his way to surgeons who worked him over as he wished. Others have already commented on his stereotypic caricature of women as decorative “babes” (“I look forward to wearing nail polish until it chips off,” he said to Diane Sawyer)—a view that understandably infuriates feminists—and his odd sense that only feelings, not facts, matter here.

For his sake, however, I do hope that he receives regular, attentive follow-up care, as his psychological serenity in the future is doubtful. Future men with similar feelings and intentions should be treated for those feelings rather than being encouraged to undergo bodily changes. Group therapies are now available for them.

Most young boys and girls who come seeking sex-reassignment are utterly different from Jenner. They have no erotic interest driving their quest. Rather, they come with psychosocial issues—conflicts over the prospects, expectations, and roles that they sense are attached to their given sex—and presume that sex-reassignment will ease or resolve them.

The grim fact is that most of these youngsters do not find therapists willing to assess and guide them in ways that permit them to work out their conflicts and correct their assumptions. Rather, they and their families find only “gender counselors” who encourage them in their sexual misassumptions.

Those with Gender Dysphoria Need Evidence-Based Care

There are several reasons for this absence of coherence in our mental health system. Important among them is the fact that both the state and federal governments are actively seeking to block any treatments that can be construed as challenging the assumptions and choices of transgendered youngsters. “As part of our dedication to protecting America’s youth, this administration supports efforts to ban the use of conversion therapy for minors,” said Valerie Jarrett, a senior advisor to President Obama.

In two states, a doctor who would look into the psychological history of a transgendered boy or girl in search of a resolvable conflict could lose his or her license to practice medicine. By contrast, such a physician would not be penalized if he or she started such a patient on hormones that would block puberty and might stunt growth.

What is needed now is public clamor for coherent science—biological and therapeutic science—examining the real effects of these efforts to “support” transgendering. Although much is made of a rare “intersex” individual, no evidence supports the claim that people such as Bruce Jenner have a biological source for their transgender assumptions. Plenty of evidence demonstrates that with him and most others, transgendering is a psychological rather than a biological matter.

In fact, gender dysphoria—the official psychiatric term for feeling oneself to be of the opposite sex—belongs in the family of similarly disordered assumptions about the body, such as anorexia nervosa and body dysmorphic disorder. Its treatment should not be directed at the body as with surgery and hormones any more than one treats obesity-fearing anorexic patients with liposuction. The treatment should strive to correct the false, problematic nature of the assumption and to resolve the psychosocial conflicts provoking it. With youngsters, this is best done in family therapy.

The larger issue is the meme itself. The idea that one’s sex is fluid and a matter open to choice runs unquestioned through our culture and is reflected everywhere in the media, the theater, the classroom, and in many medical clinics. It has taken on cult-like features: its own special lingo, internet chat rooms providing slick answers to new recruits, and clubs for easy access to dresses and styles supporting the sex change. It is doing much damage to families, adolescents, and children and should be confronted as an opinion without biological foundation wherever it emerges.

But gird your loins if you would confront this matter. Hell hath no fury like a vested interest masquerading as a moral principle.

Paul McHugh, MD, is University Distinguished Service Professor of Psychiatry at Johns Hopkins Medical School and the former psychiatrist in chief at Johns Hopkins Hospital. He is the author of The Mind Has Mountains: Reflections on Society and Psychiatry.

Advertisements

9 thoughts on “Transgenderism: A Pathogenic Meme

  1. Okay, but he’s on the wrong side.

    2009 NYT article:

    “Dr. Tiller assembled a legal team to derail Mr. Kline’s investigation. While the Kansas Supreme Court refused to quash Mr. Kline’s subpoena, it was clearly uneasy. Noting that the files “could hardly be more sensitive,” the court ordered identifying information redacted and warned both sides to “resist any impulse” to publicize the case.

    Mr. Kline’s investigators tried to identify patients anyway, court records show. Mr. Kline also hired medical experts recommended by anti-abortion groups and gave them access to the files without requiring them to pledge confidentiality.

    One expert, Paul McHugh, a professor of psychiatry at Johns Hopkins, then discussed the files — though not identities — in a videotaped interview arranged by anti-abortion activists that quickly made its way to Mr. O’Reilly and others in the news media.

    Calling Mr. Kline’s conduct “inexcusable,” the Kansas Supreme Court reprimanded him in an opinion that questioned his ethics and honesty. “Essentially, to Kline, the ends justify the means,” the justices said.”

    Liked by 4 people

      1. Perhaps right about the cause, but I would be sceptical of his solutions. When he writes the following…

        “Future men with similar feelings and intentions should be treated for those feelings rather than being encouraged to undergo bodily changes. Group therapies are now available for them.”

        …he is almost certainly talking about conversion therapy (this being the same Dr. McHugh who describes homosexuality as an “erroneous desire” and writes warmly in favour of “biblically based” social expectations). As someone with some personal experience of conversion therapy, I can most generously describe it as a waste of time.

        Liked by 1 person

  2. I may as well chuck in my two bits as one half of a trans married couple that pretended to be a cis married couple (to avoid causing upset) for two years, before we mutually decided “sod it, let’s just do this thing together while we still have lives before us” (meaning transition / reassignment). However, we did both try alternative routes. My partner’s parents sent him / her to some description of alternative new-agey therapist, while I, being a Christian, attempted a crude “conversion therapy” on myself by attending a church group that was supposed to help people get in touch with their alpha-male side. Both of these “therapies” spectacularly failed to have any effect.

    Since we are UK-based, our care pathway is through the NHS. This entails that we must submit to any psychological screening and care that is deemed appropriate to make sure that we have no underlying traumas, psychoses etc. that might account for gender dysphoria. Incidentally, we were both so scared that we requested appropriate counselling anyway. Some people, due to miscellaneous mental issues, substance issues, etc, are held up for many years, or rejected altogether and referred to their appropriate care pathway.

    Still, my GP tells me that in the absence of any history of psychological disturbance, there is no known psychiatric cure for gender dysphoria. I have heard plenty of elderly trans people from less metropolitan areas of the UK tell of how not so long ago (1970s) one did not dare come out as trans in their areas for fear of ending up in a mental asylum, but this policy seems to have been more as a result of social conservativism than any actual ability to cure anyone.

    A pure psychiatric cure may eventually be discovered, but the NHS goes with what works in the meantime. Even some trans-critical radical feminist forums acknowledge that no cure, per se, yet exists, and remain heavily divided on the subject of whether or not people should be treated for GD. I cannot speak for every trans person, but in the case of my partner and myself our coming out has improved our morale, our social lives, and our working lives. If nothing else, I am now likely to be a better taxpayer (probably also explaining why the NHS follows this care path).

    Hope you didn’t mind my contributing that. To be honest, the existence of autogynephilia is hotly disputed even in the trans forums I read. A friend of mine who is also diagnosed GD is actually quite annoyed at the thought that fetishists may be frivolously applying for transition and thus clogging up the system, and shared one of GallusMag’s articles on autogynephilia on the forum. This being a trans support forum, that gesture was not well received… Still, I can see her point. I myself, long before coming out, once had a nasty encounter with a sexually aggressive transwoman which made me very ashamed to be the same thing, but subsequently being married to a trans man thankfully healed me of shame (if not of GD).

    Like

    1. Please don’t use gender to mean “sex”, it confuses me.

      (I assume that you experience dysphoria about your actual body, not the gender role that you are expected to perform. Because feminism is the rather obvious treatment for the latter.)

      In the absence of more effective treatments I would suggest to try feminism anyway, as we get fed sexism from an early age onwards, and it is possible that the intuitive rejection of the bullshit we are told manifests as hate of their own body in some. This is not likely to be recognised as trauma by the person themselves. (Watching TV has been proven to lower the self-esteem of women and people of color, but I doubt any psychologist would consider this “traumatic”, and the children themselves obviously don’t notice either, as they happily watch TV in millions.)

      Maybe I should elaborate … what I recommend is not just reading feminist writing, but actively reading stories about gender non-conforming people who are portrayed in a positive way. (And not watching TV anymore)

      I am sure that internalized misogyny is a big factor in girls identifying as transmales. The other way round, I am not so sure, but one can try.

      One question: You write you tried to get in touch with your alpha male side, because you are (were) Christian. Why? I mean, Jesus as described in the Bible doesn’t seem to have been all that alpha male, or recommended an alpha male lifestyle, really.
      Isn’t there some cognitive dissonance in being a Christian and wanting to be alpha male?

      Like

      1. Thank you for your reply. Yes, both my spouse and I experience body dysphoria, and since decided to transition we now perform our gender roles in a physically incongruent way (by prevailing social standards). That helps, but we find it does not eliminate the body dysphoria.

        We have no TV, thankfully. One has to pay a subscription for that dubious privilege in the UK, and we decided not to bother.

        We are actually lucky enough to have a good network of gender non-conforming friends, gender-neutral, agender, gender-fluid, etc. Come to think of it, we are probably the only two “trans-binary” members of that network. We did both try being gender-fluid for a while, but found that just hammered home our mutual sense of wanting to switch to our opposite binary and stay there. I suspect if one is going to follow the route of repressing GD, one needs to do it wholeheartedly (which can hold things at bay for a long time, not that I recommend it except for people who have very pressing reasons not to transition).

        As for Jesus’s non-alpha maleness, I certainly take the point, but ironically or not one can search a long time before finding a Christian church that is supportive of transpeople (except in the “saving them from themselves” type of support). Christian “therapy” for trans people is thus almost always going to be of the type of trying to enforce stereotypical gender conformity, whether or not one wants to be alpha-male (I didn’t, but I felt so ashamed of being trans I was willing to give anything a go). At any rate, it was a dead loss.

        Like

      2. Had to rush off to work, but to address the other point you raised: if you can recommend any particular feminist perspectives on de-transitioning, I would be happy to read and consider them, and pass as much of that information to my spouse as he is amenable to having, or at least canvass his opinion on the points raised. I have already promised to read another Christian perspective on de-transitioning, being sent to me by a kind (but disapproving) friend, so I see no reason why I should not also take proper account of secular views on the same topic. Thank you.

        Like

Comments are closed.